Some notes about 'THE MUSEUM CLAUSUM'
The name, Museum Clausum translates as ‘enclosed’ or ‘sealed’
museum, and is the title of Sir Thomas Browne’s 17th Century
pamphlet, ‘MUSÆUM CLAUSUM’ (1683), which is an inventory of
'remarkable books, antiquities, pictures and rarities of
several kinds, scarce or never seen by any man now living'. This humourous and ironic treatise on the Early Modern novelty of
assembling objects in the manner of a Wunderkammer is hence an
artistic comment on the questionable artificiality of museum-type
display, as old as the museum itself.
In addition to the link to my own first name - it seemed to me a
continuation of that spirit to adopt the name.
Initially used for two exhibition projects (Museum Clausum, Deptford
and
The Deptford Maritime Museum), I adopted the name as a general artist's pseudonym - eventually
also when featuring work that does not directly reflect on
exhibition culture. By adopting this 'corporate', 'institutional'
identity, I can present myself as collector and presenter of
artefacts rather than as 'artist'. I have photographed museum
interiors for a number of years with a distinct style, which is
created 'in camera', and which I consider as matching thus unmasking
the museum's own curatorial artificiality.
Presenting my own
photographs under the umbrella title MUSEUM CLAUSUM: WUNDERCAMERA as
a 'collection', emphasises the dedicated questioning of concepts
such as curating, collecting and art making.
Another part of this whole research project is the exhibition
series, WUNDERCAMERA EXHIBITIONS.
All in all, my Wundercamera projects aim to reflect on our
relationship to objects and the importance of the role and function
of museums for our culture and self-awareness - also including a
questioning of its authority. Making work about museums reflects on
the culture of exhibiting by putting museums on display. Emphasising
the artifice in which objects are staged aims to draw attention to
the relative transparency of the institution when constructing and
presenting narratives. This, by default, creates room to question
those very narratives on display whilst exposing the museum's
complicity in perpetuating desired narratives and concealing others.
In this respect, my work is certainly a critique of the institution,
yet it is also always a declaration of love - a homage and an
acknowledgement of the museum space as a possible medium for
critical art practice as proved through a long tradition of artists
who have worked on or with the museum. One could say that it is an
aim to foster and promote increased critical 'museum literacy', as
current changes in museums' policies are in danger to remain
inadequate and superficial if these are not additionally supported
by changes in museum visitors' way of perceiving or 'reading'
museums -in short, being aware that the museum's authority is to be
questioned. Otherwise the museum will continue to simply 'tell'
stories - only that the stories told have been altered to suit
current political trends.
